Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Monday tiff
What I can learn from my Monday tiff is that part of my job is filling in for other people and making sure that, at the end of the day, that everything is taken care of. But while stepping into other people’s shoes my be part of my job description, certainly covering for someone while he refuses to do work on a project so clearly in his domain is not.
Where can we draw the line as lower level employees therefore at what we will and will not do? I know that we should be happy to have jobs, and eager to move up in the world, but how many dues should I be paying? I do think that when I stepped in to handle the remnants of the Monday tiff project and managed to get it back on track and out the door in time (of course to end up having its presentation postponed- imagine that!), that I was the only one who cared about the project at the end of the day, and the leader of the project should care too!
All this being said, tomorrow in my review there are certainly many things to discuss, not the least of which is what my true responsibilities are in my position and to what extent other people are allowed to take advantage of my responsibility and use it to compensate for their lack of exertion. Everyone at every level of every company should be working hard to make it through these tough times; leaving things to other people will only leave you out in the cold.
Thursday, September 24, 2009
Commuting in the time of swine flu
A short post today as I actually have work to do tonight (good or bad?) and should get to it instead of unloading the dishwasher, making my lunch for tomorrow, hanging up the clothes on my floor, and opening all my spam mail . . . general procrastination.
Larry Brilliant, an epidemiologist and general visionary (aptly named!) from my hometown that I know both as a parent of a childhood classmate, as well as a contact for a high school project I did on small pox, wrote in the Huff Post this week about swine flu. “Love in the time of Swine Flue” is an introduction and assessment of the pandemic as well as his experience with the disease itself, having contracted it in the spring. It is a great piece, and the first in a three part series about the disease.
Keep you posted on Dr. Brilliant’s second and third pieces.
Monday, September 21, 2009
Peggy Olson and women since 1972
In Arianna Huffington’s recent post on her eponymous site, "The Sad, Shocking Truth About How women Are Feeling," she introduces a new huff post contributor, Marcus Buckingham, who will examine over a series of pieces the sad and surprising truth about the declining happiness of women since the women's movement of the 60s and 70s.
If we compare Peggy to women today, one might imagine, and Buckingham suggests that even Betty Friedan herself, would imagine that women today must be happier because of all the advances we have made across employment, politics, education, etc. But in fact, according to the US General Social Survey evaluating the happiness of women beginning in 1972, women have assigned a generally decreasing value to their happiness over time.
While Buckingham’s first post presents mostly data, which I assume he will analyze and try to explain, and then hopefully hypothesize about today or the future in upcoming posts, you can’t help but wonder why it’s true that happiness is declining among women. Is it because we no longer wonder and wish for acknowledge of what we can do, but now wonder what we’re not doing and why?
While women’s rights and general equality was just starting to take shape in this season of Mad Men, in some ways though we women might be jealous of Peggy: brave enough to ask her boss for a raise, she has multiple opportunities, seemingly limitless ambitions, and nowhere to go but up. These days, when down seems to be the only direction, what I wouldn’t give for a little ambition and a healthy dose of naivete.
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
What is your job description?
The author of this post is a first year participant and CEO of an online backup service. Upon thinking about how someone would train for or take over her job, she realizes that she probably wastes time each time on tasks that others are better equipped, and better utilized, in executing. She proposes therefore that we all examine the roles in our company to study the distribution of employees across departments, the overlap of their responsibilities, and where we may be spread too thin or overindulging ourselves. While she’s likely proposing this exercise for those at the top level of management, I think anyone could utilize the same steps she describes to study their role in a company, community organization, or even a class workgroup, to illuminate areas of their job description that need further support, or even instances of success that could provide a model other departments or procedures.
I’m going to give it a try for my job and let you guys know how I do! Check back soon.
Monday, September 14, 2009
I still have my healthcare . . . until I don't have it
Perhaps it seems unnecessary to be fixated on my health insurance when I’m employed, but I don’t think it is. Especially in today’s economy, when any employee at any level of a given firm should fear the extensive and undiminished effects of the recession, healthcare should be at the forefront of people’s minds.
And it is, for the most part, but it’s hard to believe that after reading stories like that told in Nicholas Kristof’s op-ed of the weekend in the NYTimes, The Body Count at Home, that it isn’t a priority for everyone as well. The character in Kristof’s piece (see the Online Reading List, or click on this link: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/13/opinion/13kristof.html?_r=1) eventually loses her life to Lupus- a manageable and treatable disease- because when she lost her job she could not get new care with a preexisting condition.
Now, I don’t have a preexisting condition, but Kristof’s protagonist reminds me how undependable healthcare can be when you are unemployed, and makes me think about the stability of health care in my life. What if I’m laid off? Will I be able to find and afford a new plan? Can I fill my prescriptions? Will I keep my doctors? And I take it a step further: does having employer based healthcare scare people into staying at their jobs? Does our system therefore inhibit entrepreneurship, innovation, and creativity? I believe it absolutely does. If you are someone who has gained great experience and insight from your first job, but may want to break out on your own, will you decline to go through with it because you need to keep going to the eye doctor to order contacts? Probably. You’ll at least think twice or three times about what new ideas are worth to you relative to the sensation of safety provided by a dependable healthcare plan.